Allegheny County, Pennsylvania
Allegheny County courts sought redaction software to protect sensitive information within public documents.
Buncombe County, North Carolina Register of Deeds
Buncombe County’s Register of Deeds accomplished the goal of improving services and accessibility while saving the county money using technology.
Canton, Ohio Municipal Court
Canton Court officials quickly realized that automated redaction would be necessary to process 250,000 documents annually.
Colorado Secretary of State
When the Colorado Secretary of State disabled web access to secured transaction records in early 2007, they had to go back to the "brick and mortar" way of doing business.
Davidson County, Tennessee
A county replaces their existing redaction vendor, saving money without sacrificing on quality.
Dekalb County, Illinois
Making records available through a website improves customer service and minimizes the inefficiencies associated with the walk-in traffic.
Fairfax County, Virginia
Fairfax County wanted to balance data access with personal data privacy by redacting records available via its secure, remote access database.
Greene County, Missouri
Greene County was concerned that internet records access could put constituents' private data at greater risk for identity theft.
Hamilton County, Ohio
Hamilton County, Ohio Clerk of Courts & Juvenile Court accomplished the goal of providing online access to court records by implementing Extract’s ID Shield software.
Illinois Secretary of State
As part of its responsibility to administer the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), the Illinois Secretary of State's office files financing statements and maintains a record-keeping system to allow quick and accurate searches.
Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth
Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts faced the challenge of protecting access to publicly filed documents while still protecting the individuals identified in those documents from identity theft.
Midland County, Texas
The county sought a solution for the intelligent classification of documents in the Arrest Packet and the auto-capture of 28 fields from the booking sheet.
Montgomery County, Ohio
In early 2008, Ohio General Assembly enacted House Bill 46, mandating public offices to redact private information from any document made available to the public on the internet.
Orange County, California
Orange County reduced manual data entry, brought redaction in-house, and reduced the public access wait time for documents from 6-12 days, to only 48-hours.
Pierce County Washington
Pierce County wanted to redact DOBs and SSNs dating back to 1969 and over 36 million images.
Racine County, Wisconsin
When a new Register of Deeds came to office in 2011, they evaluated the office's current document processing workflows to see where the county could become efficient.
York County, Pennsylvania
In September 2009, the Clerks of Court for York and Lancaster County were advised of a scheme targeting individuals who had been convicted of DUI offenses in York and Lancaster Counties.
Washington County, Arkansas
In June 2013, the Arkansas Supreme Court ruled that in accordance with Administrative Order 19 there would be a redaction requirement on pre-2009 documents available online.